• Folke, C. et al. Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere. Ambio 50, 834–869 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, N. B. et al. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319, 756 (2008).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Seto, K. C., Fragkias, M., Güneralp, B. & Reilly, M. K. A. Meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS ONE 6, e23777 (2011).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrfahrdt-Pähle, E. et al. Sustainability transformations: socio-political shocks as opportunities for governance transitions. Glob. Environ. Change 63, 102097–102097 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Norström, A. V. et al. Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nat. Sustain. 3, 182–190 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Culwick, C. et al. CityLab reflections and evolutions: nurturing knowledge and learning for urban sustainability through co-production experimentation. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 39, 9–16 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, D. P. M. et al. Scaling the impact of sustainability initiatives: a typology of amplification processes. Urban Transform. 2, 3–3 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruhl, J. B., Katz, D. M. & Bommarito, M. J. Harnessing legal complexity. Science 355, 1377–1378 (2017).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmqvist, T. et al. Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century. Nat. Sustain. 2, 267–273 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, J., Soininen, N., Collier, M. & Raymond, C. M. Finding feasible action towards urban transformations. npj Urban Sustain. 1, 28 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. New Urban Agenda. Report No. ISBN: 978-92-1-132731-1 (UN, 2017).

  • United Nations. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (EEA, 2015).

  • McCormick, K., Anderberg, S., Coenen, L. & Neij, L. Advancing sustainable urban transformation. J. Clean. Prod. 50, 1–11 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhearson, T. et al. Radical changes are needed for transformations to a good Anthropocene. npj Urban Sustain. 1, 5 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives, C. D., Freeth, R. & Fischer, J. Inside-out sustainability: the neglect of inner worlds. Ambio 49, 208–217 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Abson, D. J. et al. Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio 46, 30–39 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J. & Riechers, M. A leverage points perspective on sustainability. People Nat. 1, 115–120 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, X. M. et al. Six research priorities for cities and climate change. Nature 555, 19–21 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbing, D. Towards Digital Enlightenment: Essays on the Dark and LIght Sides of the Digital Revolution (Springer, 2019).

  • Scholz, R. W. et al. Unintended side effects of the digital transition: European Scientists’ Messages from a Proposition-Based Expert Round Table. Sustainability 10, 2001 (2018).

  • Ilieva, R. T. & McPhearson, T. Social-media data for urban sustainability. Nat. Sustain. 1, 553–565 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, H. J. Geographic information science I. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 41, 489–500 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia, M., Komeily, A., Wang, Y. & Srinivasan, R. S. Adopting Internet of Things for the development of smart buildings: a review of enabling technologies and applications. Autom. Constr. 101, 111–126 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • White, G., Zink, A., Codecá, L. & Clarke, S. A digital twin smart city for citizen feedback. Cities 110, 103064 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, K. Is the 1.5 °C target possible? Exploring the three spheres of transformation. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 31, 153–160 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, E. M. et al. Bright spots: seeds of a good Anthropocene. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14, 441–448 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, H. J. Geographic information science III: GIScience, fast and slow – why faster geographic information is not always smarter. Progr. Hum. Geogr 44, 129–138 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69, 211–221 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. Engaging the wisdom of crowds and public judgement for land use planning using Public Participation Geographic Information Systems. Austral. Plan. 52, 199–209 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riechers, M., Balázsi, Á., García-Llorente, M. & Loos, J. Human-nature connectedness as leverage point. Ecosyst. People 17, 215–221 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadhim, N., Mourshed, M. & Bray, M. Advances in remote sensing applications for urban sustainability. EMJE 1, 7 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., Zhang, X., Xin, Q., Sun, Y. & Zhang, P. Automatic building extraction from high-resolution aerial images and LiDAR data using gated residual refinement network. ISPRS. J. Photogramm. Rem. Sens. 151, 91–105 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal-Tzur, A. et al. The potential of social media in delivering transport policy goals. Transp. Policy 32, 115–123 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooding, J., Edwards, H., Giesekam, J. & Crook, R. Solar City Indicator: a methodology to predict city level PV installed capacity by combining physical capacity and socio-economic factors. Solar Energy 95, 325–335 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Z. et al. Understanding an urbanizing planet: strategic directions for remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ. 228, 164–182 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., Koks, E., Taubenböck, H. & van Vliet, J. Continental-scale mapping and analysis of 3D building structure. Remote Sens. Environ. 245, 111859 (2020).

  • van Vliet, J. Direct and indirect loss of natural area from urban expansion. Nat. Sustain. 2, 755–763 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, J. D. & Ebisu, K. Changes in U.S. air pollution during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci. Total Environ. 739, 139864 (2020).

  • Oozeki, Y. et al. Reliable estimation of IUU fishing catch amounts in the northwestern Pacific adjacent to the Japanese EEZ: Potential for usage of satellite remote sensing images. Mar. Policy 88, 64–74 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, N. et al. Remote sensing of night lights: a review and an outlook for the future. Remote Sens. Environ. 237, 111443 (2020).

  • Voytenko, Y., McCormick, K., Evans, J. & Schliwa, G. Urban Living Labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: towards a research agenda. J. Clean. Prod. 123, 45–54 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, C. M. et al. A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas. Environ. Sci. Pol. 77, 15–24 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, S. R. J. et al. Future visioning of local climate change: a framework for community engagement and planning with scenarios and visualisation. Futures 43, 400–412 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Voinov, A. et al. Tools and methods in participatory modeling: selecting the right tool for the job. Environ. Model. Softw. 109, 232–255 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, S., Cradock-Henry, N. A., Blackett, P. & Edwards, P. Adaptive and interactive climate futures: systematic review of ‘serious games’ for engagement and decision-making. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 063005–063005 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wissen Hayek, U., von Wirth, T., Neuenschwander, N. & Grêt-Regamey, A. Organizing and facilitating Geodesign processes: integrating tools into collaborative design processes for urban transformation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 156, 59–70 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumitrescu, D. & Ross, A. R. N. Embedding, quoting, or paraphrasing? Investigating the effects of political leaders’ tweets in online news articles: the case of Donald Trump. New Media Soc 23, 2279–2302 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, B. E., Ardèvol-Abreu, A. & De Zúñiga, H. G. Online influence? Social media use, opinion leadership, and political persuasion. Int. J. Public Opin. 29, 214–239 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N. & Valenzuela, S. Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. J. Comput.-Media. Comm. 17, 319–336 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neset, T.-S. et al. Supporting dialogue and analysis on trade-offs in climate adaptation research with the maladaptation game. Simul. Gaming 51, 378–399 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamstead, Z. A. et al. Geolocated social media as a rapid indicator of park visitation and equitable park access. Comp. Environ. Urban Syst. 72, 38–50 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oteros-Rozas, E., Martín-López, B., Fagerholm, N., Bieling, C. & Plieninger, T. Using social media photos to explore the relation between cultural ecosystem services and landscape features across five European sites. Ecol. Indic. 94, 74–86 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, C. M., Kenter, J. O., Plieninger, T., Turner, N. J. & Alexander, K. A. Comparing instrumental and deliberative paradigms underpinning the assessment of social values for cultural ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 107, 145–156 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Plieninger, T., Dijks, S., Oteros-Rozas, E. & Bieling, C. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 33, 118–129 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennis, J., Mason, M. & Ambrus, A. Urban greenspace is associated with reduced psychological stress among adolescents: a Geographic Ecological Momentary Assessment (GEMA) analysis of activity space. Landsc. Urban Plan. 174, 1–9 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salliou, N. et al. Game of Cruxes: co-designing a game for scientists and stakeholders for identifying joint problems. Sustain. Sci. 16, 1763–1763 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyttä, M., Broberg, A., Haybatollahi, M. & Schmidt-Thomé, K. Urban happiness: context-sensitive study of the social sustainability of urban settings. Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 43, 34–57 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielhofer, R. et al. Physiological and behavioral reactions to renewable energy systems in various landscape types. Renew. Sustain. Ener. Rev. 135, 110410 (2021).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, D. A. et al. Neighborhood environments influence emotion and physiological reactivity. Sci. Rep. 9, 9498 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerholm, N. et al. A methodological framework for analysis of participatory mapping data in research, planning, and management. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 35, 1–28 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. J., Goodchild, M. F. & Longley, P. A. Geospatial Analysis – A Comprehensive Guide to Principles Techniques and Software Tools (Drumlin Security Ltd, 2018).

  • Lechner, A. M. et al. Characterizing spatial uncertainty when integrating social data in conservation planning. Cons. Biol. 28, 1497–1511 (2014).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, L., Hausner, V. H., Runge, C., Brown, G. & Daigle, R. Using crowdsourced spatial data from Flickr vs. PPGIS for understanding nature’s contribution to people in Southern Norway. People Nat. 2, 437–449 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikinheimo, V. et al. Understanding the use of urban green spaces from user-generated geographic information. Landsc. Urban Plan. 201, 103845–103845 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Depietri, Y., Ghermandi, A., Campisi-Pinto, S. & Orenstein, D. E. Public participation GIS versus geolocated social media data to assess urban cultural ecosystem services: instances of complementarity. Ecosyst. Ser. 50, 101277 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, W., Pickett, S. T. A. & McPhearson, T. Conceptual frameworks facilitate integration for transdisciplinary urban science. npj Urban Sustain. 1, 1 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, C. M., Kyttä, M. & Stedman, R. Sense of place, fast and slow: the potential contributions of affordance theory to sense of place. Front. Psych. 8, 1674–1674 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieminen, J., Salomaa, A. & Juhola, S. Governing urban sustainability transitions: urban planning regime and modes of governance. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 64, 559–580 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zufferey, J. & Wanner, P. La distribution spatiale de la population étrangère en Suisse. Soc. Chang. Switz. 22, 141540 (2020).

  • City of Schlieren. Neuauflage des Stadtentwicklungskonzepts der Stadt Schlieren – Schlussbericht https://urbanista.ch/stadtentwicklungskonzept-schlieren/ (2016).

  • Natural Capital Project. Natural Capital Singapore http://www.naturalcapital.sg/ (2021).

  • Friess, D. A. Singapore as a long-term case study for tropical urban ecosystem services. Urban Ecosys. 20, 277–291 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicki, S., Schwaab, J., Perhac, J. & Gret-Regamey, A. Participatory multi-objective optimization for planning dense and green cities. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 64, 2532–2532 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauka, S. Climate Resilience in Developing Cities: Msimbazi Basin, Dar es Salaam (South African Institute of International Affairs, 2019).

  • Petersson, L. et al. Community mapping supports comprehensive urban flood modeling for flood risk management in a data-scarce environment. Front. Earth Sci. 8, 304 (2020).

  • World Bank. Tanzania Urban Resilience Program (TURP) https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/tanzania-urban-resilience-program (2021).

  • Mäntysalo, R., Tuomisaari, J., Granqvist, K. & Kanninen, V. The strategic incrementalism of Lahti master planning: three lessons. Plan. Theory & Pract. 20, 555–572 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. D. et al. Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nat. Sustain. 2, 805–814 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, H. & Reason, P. The Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participatory Inquire and Practice (Sage, 2009).

  • Chan, K. M. A. et al. Levers and leverage points for pathways to sustainability. People Nat. 2, 693–717 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, C. & Franklin, R. S. The sensor desert quandary: what does it mean (not) to count in the smart city? Trans. Inst. Brit. Geogr. 0/0, 1–17 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmqvist, T. et al. Urbanization in and for the Anthropocene. npj Urban Sustain. 1, 6 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnhout, E., Metze, T., Wyborn, C., Klenk, N. & Louder, E. The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 42, 15–21 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poom, A., Järv, O., Zook, M. & Toivonen, T. COVID-19 is spatial: ensuring that mobile Big Data is used for social good. Big Data Soc. 7, 205395172095208 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Sabri, S., Rajabifard, A. & Agunbiade, M. E. An ontology-based spatial data harmonisation for urban analytics. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 72, 177–190 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • By AKDSEO